I would say I'm shocked, but then I remember when they played Pandemic prior to Covid. Pretend play in the DMV often ends up becoming headlines in real life. Either let FDA actually regulate or shut it down and let pharma sell what they want honestly - without a fake "safe and effective" stamp used to deceive patients. I'm personally not interested in funding drugs that hurt people.
If you want to cure cancer, you should look for Dr. Marik and others on Substack. They're already doing it.
I know personally two people that used Ivermectin and Fenbendozol to cure stage 4 cancer in 3 months after the oncology hacks told them they had less than 6 months to live.
Cures exist. Pharma knows it. But they can't make any money curing people and eliminating a $10+ billion cash cow, now can they?
Thank you for posting this … and for the courage to resist and to speak out. I will share it to the maximum extent possible. I found this information linked on Maria Zeee’s channel on Telegram, so you can be assured that you are being heard on SM. It’s so disheartening that our government works against us rather than for us, in concert with Big Pharma driven by big profits. The depopulation agenda hasn’t slowed down.
True primary disease prevention requires intervention well before clinics, hospitals, and operating rooms. I agree with you and the fact that is the best way to reduce the cost of healthcare by reducing the incidence and prevalence of chronic illness. But the leverage points to create the impact we need are more politically determined than they are by individual physicians or healthcare providers.
This was great to read. I may not agree with everything you said and our opinions may differ somewhat, but I think we both see where the problems are.
Thanks for pointing me in that direction! I enjoy your ideas and look forward to reading more. I think many Americans see these problems but are unsure what to do about both individually and collectively. I think the political right and left have been arguing over who pays and how we pay for healthcare, but never how do we lower costs.
I took an online Harvard course last year on healthcare economics. I learned a lot, but it was still the same argument over the who and how of payment - not cost reduction by way of disease reduction. There are a plethora of examples from an epidemiological standpoint that we can reflect on from sanitation, to identifying disease sources, to quarantining. Those examples demonstrate the need for state based solutions. I am impartial whether they come from city, state, or federal mandates. But individual and group responsibility is often overshadowed by the illusion or misinterpretation of freedom.
A brief example involves the restriction of 72oz sodas in NYC in the 2010s was considered an attack on individual freedom while the purpose was to improve healthy choices. Perhaps “choice” restriction through paper mandates do not make us responsible citizens, but we have to begin to (re)learn somehow.
I appreciate your giving us the scoop on this, but it's not clear to me what you are suggesting we do to kill/stop/neutralize this EO proposal. For the concrete-response-challenged, would you add some specific actions?
Good point. I think for now it’s get the word out that OWS should never again be resurrected, on social media is a good start. And it NEVER hurts to call your members of Congress bc they ALWAYS fall for this “cure cancer by cutting corners at FDA” scam. All the current accelerated pathways for approval came from them. Because they’re exceptionally weak when patient groups demand this and that’s why Pharma funds all those patient groups.
"CMS shall ensure that Medicare beneficiaries can access OWS 2.0-designated products within 30 days of FDA authorization.”
Translation: use people who are poor, disabled, and the elderly (largest cohort on Medicare) as guinea pigs.
I also am well aware of an individual who your readers support who I'm not going to name right now who went to the White House last year in March and made some recommendations about fast tracking and using organoids only or computer models. And there it is.
I had to stop long before I finished reading to comment. I'll finish for sure, but you've missed the most fundamental elephant in the room: the reason we have the worst medical and health outcomes in the world is BECAUSE of Big Pharma more than anything else.
It's no longer health care. It's sick care. And the secret to being healthy is to ignore and avoid the system. Drugs and screening which cause harms and constant lowering of the "you're sick, take this drug" thresholds is what's caused most of the harm.
And the WORST thing about Warp Speed 1.0 is that damned shot is responsible for MASSIVE increase in all cause mortality. Especially in young, working aged ppl.
Where the hell did turbo cancer come from? To medical experts, it's a mystery! But if you talk to anyone that analyzes the actual data, they can prove it first spiked 6 months after the shots started and is still climbing. And the proof is no longer just overwhelming correlation. Published papers show the biological connections.
That program was a Dept of Defense contract. It was an attack on citizens that did exactly what the gain of function research intended by the contracts that paid to create it.
Don't be the last person in the room to see the facts. Never before in history have young, healthy people dropped dead of a heart attack at 25-35 yrs old. Never have world class athletes dropped dead on the field of play... more in 2022 than ever before in all of history combined. On live TV.
25 y.o. diagnosed suddenly with stage 4 cancer, dying in 3 months. On and on and on.
Dig deeper. A lot deeper. Warp Speed was a democidal psyop that succeeded beyond all hopes and expectations of it's creators and operators.
And, sorry, but at least half of the US population knows. Don't stay blind.
It looks to me like an intent to cull the old, sick people with pharmaceuticals in order to save Medicare from bankruptcy. Younger sick people don't get Medicare, but help to fund the pharmaceutical payroll.
Fabulous piece which I shared on LinkedIn with the following introduction - "If you want to understand how [some but not all] healthcare and especially pharmaceutical advances (effective or not) are made by social saavy more than scientific rigor, take 10 minutes to read this fabulous piece by epidemiologist, veteran White House advisor, health care policy/reformer, and naturopathic clinician, Katy Talento." At least when I was working the beat in vaccines for GSK and Emergent BioSolutions back in the early 2000s, we were "science-first" and driven by "first do no harm". And the system in which we muddled about still considered us untrustworthy without valid data. Thank you Katy.
It's moronic to seek to cure cancer when the population is being poisoned on purpose. A poisoned population is weaker and easier to control. Then, after some time, become customers of a very profitable industry utilizing pharmaceuticals that are prescribed for the rest of the life of the poisoned population, tests, treatments, etc. Cure cancer and Alzheimer's by not poisoning people to begin with.
The only disagreement I have in this article is the demonization of tobacco. This disagreement stems from lumping organic tobacco in with commercial tobacco.
Commercial tobacco is like saying potatoes are bad because of pringles. The are a great many studies over the last century that show therapeutic benefits from the proper application of nicotine unadulterated by the processed tobacco producing companies.
I have come to believe that the many vectored attacks on the health of world populations is due to a depopulation agenda. Understanding that many things make sense.
The issue here was the forced approval of fruit-flavored vapes owned by Big Tobacco companies. FDA leadership didn’t want to do so, and it’s a violation of the Tobacco Control Act, but those companies went to political war against FDA through the WH. This is the main impetus for Marty Makary resigning.
I currently live in Washington state. There was a time in Washington state when corporations had to file paperwork to prove they were of benefit to the population as a whole.
That has fallen by the wayside sometime ago, and the psychopaths have taken over most of the corporations. We are in a classic end of empire time. Fasten your seatbelt, rough weather is approaching.
I would say I'm shocked, but then I remember when they played Pandemic prior to Covid. Pretend play in the DMV often ends up becoming headlines in real life. Either let FDA actually regulate or shut it down and let pharma sell what they want honestly - without a fake "safe and effective" stamp used to deceive patients. I'm personally not interested in funding drugs that hurt people.
Exactly!!
Surrogate markers are such a big one. I recently started looking into the supposed evidence that everyone needs more fiber, and I found:
1. It increases the variety of beneficial bacteria in your stools. [I think this is my favorite surrogate marker ever]
2. It eases constipation. [Well, not everyone is constipated].
I'm not convinced.
Great piece as usual, Katy.
Thanks Moorea!!
WARP SPEED 2.0, EBOLA FOR THE HEALTHY
Exactly Ken!
It's euthanasia.
If you want to cure cancer, you should look for Dr. Marik and others on Substack. They're already doing it.
I know personally two people that used Ivermectin and Fenbendozol to cure stage 4 cancer in 3 months after the oncology hacks told them they had less than 6 months to live.
Cures exist. Pharma knows it. But they can't make any money curing people and eliminating a $10+ billion cash cow, now can they?
Thank you for posting this … and for the courage to resist and to speak out. I will share it to the maximum extent possible. I found this information linked on Maria Zeee’s channel on Telegram, so you can be assured that you are being heard on SM. It’s so disheartening that our government works against us rather than for us, in concert with Big Pharma driven by big profits. The depopulation agenda hasn’t slowed down.
Thanks so much!!
True primary disease prevention requires intervention well before clinics, hospitals, and operating rooms. I agree with you and the fact that is the best way to reduce the cost of healthcare by reducing the incidence and prevalence of chronic illness. But the leverage points to create the impact we need are more politically determined than they are by individual physicians or healthcare providers.
This was great to read. I may not agree with everything you said and our opinions may differ somewhat, but I think we both see where the problems are.
Thanks Dr. M. You might enjoy my piece that just dropped today, as it goes into this exact issue you mention even more. Katytalento.com.
Thanks for pointing me in that direction! I enjoy your ideas and look forward to reading more. I think many Americans see these problems but are unsure what to do about both individually and collectively. I think the political right and left have been arguing over who pays and how we pay for healthcare, but never how do we lower costs.
I took an online Harvard course last year on healthcare economics. I learned a lot, but it was still the same argument over the who and how of payment - not cost reduction by way of disease reduction. There are a plethora of examples from an epidemiological standpoint that we can reflect on from sanitation, to identifying disease sources, to quarantining. Those examples demonstrate the need for state based solutions. I am impartial whether they come from city, state, or federal mandates. But individual and group responsibility is often overshadowed by the illusion or misinterpretation of freedom.
A brief example involves the restriction of 72oz sodas in NYC in the 2010s was considered an attack on individual freedom while the purpose was to improve healthy choices. Perhaps “choice” restriction through paper mandates do not make us responsible citizens, but we have to begin to (re)learn somehow.
I'll wager that is the last invite of its kind coming your way 🤪
I’m guessing!
I appreciate your giving us the scoop on this, but it's not clear to me what you are suggesting we do to kill/stop/neutralize this EO proposal. For the concrete-response-challenged, would you add some specific actions?
Good point. I think for now it’s get the word out that OWS should never again be resurrected, on social media is a good start. And it NEVER hurts to call your members of Congress bc they ALWAYS fall for this “cure cancer by cutting corners at FDA” scam. All the current accelerated pathways for approval came from them. Because they’re exceptionally weak when patient groups demand this and that’s why Pharma funds all those patient groups.
Thanks!
So they are going to talk about Ivermectin and HCQ and Fenbendozol!
Lol
"CMS shall ensure that Medicare beneficiaries can access OWS 2.0-designated products within 30 days of FDA authorization.”
Translation: use people who are poor, disabled, and the elderly (largest cohort on Medicare) as guinea pigs.
I also am well aware of an individual who your readers support who I'm not going to name right now who went to the White House last year in March and made some recommendations about fast tracking and using organoids only or computer models. And there it is.
I had to stop long before I finished reading to comment. I'll finish for sure, but you've missed the most fundamental elephant in the room: the reason we have the worst medical and health outcomes in the world is BECAUSE of Big Pharma more than anything else.
It's no longer health care. It's sick care. And the secret to being healthy is to ignore and avoid the system. Drugs and screening which cause harms and constant lowering of the "you're sick, take this drug" thresholds is what's caused most of the harm.
And the WORST thing about Warp Speed 1.0 is that damned shot is responsible for MASSIVE increase in all cause mortality. Especially in young, working aged ppl.
Where the hell did turbo cancer come from? To medical experts, it's a mystery! But if you talk to anyone that analyzes the actual data, they can prove it first spiked 6 months after the shots started and is still climbing. And the proof is no longer just overwhelming correlation. Published papers show the biological connections.
That program was a Dept of Defense contract. It was an attack on citizens that did exactly what the gain of function research intended by the contracts that paid to create it.
Don't be the last person in the room to see the facts. Never before in history have young, healthy people dropped dead of a heart attack at 25-35 yrs old. Never have world class athletes dropped dead on the field of play... more in 2022 than ever before in all of history combined. On live TV.
25 y.o. diagnosed suddenly with stage 4 cancer, dying in 3 months. On and on and on.
Dig deeper. A lot deeper. Warp Speed was a democidal psyop that succeeded beyond all hopes and expectations of it's creators and operators.
And, sorry, but at least half of the US population knows. Don't stay blind.
It looks to me like an intent to cull the old, sick people with pharmaceuticals in order to save Medicare from bankruptcy. Younger sick people don't get Medicare, but help to fund the pharmaceutical payroll.
Fabulous piece which I shared on LinkedIn with the following introduction - "If you want to understand how [some but not all] healthcare and especially pharmaceutical advances (effective or not) are made by social saavy more than scientific rigor, take 10 minutes to read this fabulous piece by epidemiologist, veteran White House advisor, health care policy/reformer, and naturopathic clinician, Katy Talento." At least when I was working the beat in vaccines for GSK and Emergent BioSolutions back in the early 2000s, we were "science-first" and driven by "first do no harm". And the system in which we muddled about still considered us untrustworthy without valid data. Thank you Katy.
Thank you so much Dr Z!! I really appreciate your feedback and support. Hang in there
It's moronic to seek to cure cancer when the population is being poisoned on purpose. A poisoned population is weaker and easier to control. Then, after some time, become customers of a very profitable industry utilizing pharmaceuticals that are prescribed for the rest of the life of the poisoned population, tests, treatments, etc. Cure cancer and Alzheimer's by not poisoning people to begin with.
The only disagreement I have in this article is the demonization of tobacco. This disagreement stems from lumping organic tobacco in with commercial tobacco.
Commercial tobacco is like saying potatoes are bad because of pringles. The are a great many studies over the last century that show therapeutic benefits from the proper application of nicotine unadulterated by the processed tobacco producing companies.
I have come to believe that the many vectored attacks on the health of world populations is due to a depopulation agenda. Understanding that many things make sense.
The issue here was the forced approval of fruit-flavored vapes owned by Big Tobacco companies. FDA leadership didn’t want to do so, and it’s a violation of the Tobacco Control Act, but those companies went to political war against FDA through the WH. This is the main impetus for Marty Makary resigning.
I currently live in Washington state. There was a time in Washington state when corporations had to file paperwork to prove they were of benefit to the population as a whole.
That has fallen by the wayside sometime ago, and the psychopaths have taken over most of the corporations. We are in a classic end of empire time. Fasten your seatbelt, rough weather is approaching.
It’s still required by the IRS, called the Community Benefit Assessment. But it’s an absolute joke.